c++单元测试框架的比较。-Comparisonofc++unittestframeworks

91  

I've just pushed my own framework, CATCH, out there. It's still under development but I believe it already surpasses most other frameworks. Different people have different criteria but I've tried to cover most ground without too many trade-offs. Take a look at my linked blog entry for a taster. My top five features are:

我刚刚推出了自己的框架。它还在开发中，但我相信它已经超越了大多数其他框架。不同的人有不同的标准，但我尽量不做太多的权衡。看一看我的链接博客文章。我的五大特点是:

• Header only
• 头只
• Auto registration of function and method based tests
• 自动注册功能和基于方法的测试。
• Decomposes standard C++ expressions into LHS and RHS (so you don't need a whole family of assert macros).
• 将标准c++表达式分解为LHS和RHS(因此您不需要一个完整的assert宏家族)。
• Support for nested sections within a function based fixture
• 支持基于功能的fixture中的嵌套部分。
• Name tests using natural language - function/ method names are generated
• 使用自然语言-函数/方法名称进行名称测试。

It also has Objective-C bindings. The project is hosted on Github

它还有Objective-C绑定。该项目由Github托管。

45  

Boost Test Library is a very good choice especially if you're already using Boost.

Boost测试库是一个非常好的选择，特别是如果您已经在使用Boost。

// TODO: Include your class to test here.
#define BOOST_TEST_MODULE MyTest
#include 

BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MyTestCase)
{
    // To simplify this example test, let's suppose we'll test 'float'.
    // Some test are stupid, but all should pass.
    float x = 9.5f;

    BOOST_CHECK(x != 0.0f);
    BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL((int)x, 9);
    BOOST_CHECK_CLOSE(x, 9.5f, 0.0001f); // Checks differ no more then 0.0001%
}

It supports:

它支持:

• Automatic or manual tests registration
• 自动或手动测试注册。
• Many assertions
• 很多人断言
• Automatic comparison of collections
• 自动收集的比较
• Various output formats (including XML)
• 各种输出格式(包括XML)
• Fixtures / Templates...
• 设备/模板……

PS: I wrote an article about it that may help you getting started: C++ Unit Testing Framework: A Boost Test Tutorial

PS:我写了一篇关于它的文章，可以帮助你入门:c++单元测试框架:Boost测试教程。

19  

Wikipedia has a comprehensive list of unit testing frameworks, with tables that identify features supported or not.

Wikipedia拥有一个完整的单元测试框架列表，其中有一些表可以识别支持的或不支持的特性。

12  

I've recently released xUnit++, specifically as an alternative to Google Test and the Boost Test Library (view the comparisons). If you're familiar with xUnit.Net, you're ready for xUnit++.

我最近发布了xUnit++，特别是作为谷歌测试和Boost测试库的替代品(查看比较)。如果你熟悉xUnit。Net，你已经准备好了xUnit++。

#include "xUnit++/xUnit++.h"

FACT("Foo and Blah should always return the same value")
{
    Check.Equal("0", Foo()) <<"Calling Foo() with no parameters should always return \"0\".";
    Assert.Equal(Foo(), Blah());
}

THEORY("Foo should return the same value it was given, converted to string", (int input, std::string expected),
    std::make_tuple(0, "0"),
    std::make_tuple(1, "1"),
    std::make_tuple(2, "2"))
{
    Assert.Equal(expected, Foo(input));
}

Main features:

主要特点:

• Incredibly fast: tests run concurrently.
• 难以置信的快:测试并发运行。
• Portable
• 可移植的
• Automatic test registration
• 自动测试注册
• Many assertion types (Boost has nothing on xUnit++)
• 许多断言类型(Boost在xUnit++上没有任何内容)
• Compares collections natively.
• 比较本地集合。
• Assertions come in three levels:
  • fatal errors
  • 致命错误
  • non-fatal errors
  • 非致命错误
  • warnings
  • 警告
• 断言有三个级别:致命错误、非致命错误警告。
• Easy assert logging: Assert.Equal(-1, foo(i)) <<"Failed with i = " <
• 容易维护日志:断言。等于(-1,foo(i)) <<
• Test logging: Log.Debug <<"Starting test"; Log.Warn <<"Here's a warning";
• 测试记录:日志。调试<<“开始测试”;日志。警告<<此处是警告> ;
• Fixtures
• 固定装置
• Data-driven tests (Theories)
• 数据驱动测试(理论)
• Select which tests to run based on:
  • Attribute matching
  • 属性匹配
  • Name substring matchin
  • 名字子串matchin
  • Test Suites
  • 测试套件
• 选择要运行的测试:属性匹配名称子字符串matchin测试套件。