python一次性键入数组_键入两次测试，一次使用语音识别

python一次性键入数组

People give voice recognition a bad name. I use it all the time. I took the typing test that Daniel Moth blogged about (typing test is here) typing the way I usually do. I can&＃39;t type as fast as I could as my hands are a little rough, but I do OK for old hands.

人们给语音识别起一个坏名字。 我用它所有的时间。 我接受了Daniel Moth所写的打字测试(这里是打字测试)&＃xff0c;以通常的方式打字。 我的手有点粗糙&＃xff0c;但打字速度却不尽如人意&＃xff0c;但对于老手我还是可以的。

Here&＃39;s my results, first try, on a Natural (split) Keyboard:

这是我在自然(分体)键盘上进行首次尝试的结果&＃xff1a;

YOUR RESULTS ARE:

您的结果是&＃xff1a;

Number of words typed: 217
Test duration: 3 min
Speed: 72.6 words/min. (363 keystrokes/min.)
Error penalty: 27
Accuracy: 87.6%

输入的字数&＃xff1a;217 测试时间&＃xff1a;3分钟速度&＃xff1a;72.6字/分钟。 (每分钟363次按键) 错误罚款&＃xff1a;27 准确度&＃xff1a;87.6&＃xff05;

Meh. I used to do 100, no longer. (Plus, it&＃39;s a cheesy test because you have to read, manage the scrolling and spit it back out again on the keyboards. I got flummoxed with the scrolling. And I&＃39;m notoriously sloppy.

嗯我曾经做100个&＃xff0c;不再。 (此外&＃xff0c;这是一个俗气的测试&＃xff0c;因为您必须阅读&＃xff0c;管理滚动并再次将其吐回到键盘上。我对滚动感到迷惑不解。而且众所周知&＃xff0c;我很草率。

Here&＃39;s the SAME test but using Vista Voice Recognition and a cheapo Logitech USB Headset Microphone (I didn&＃39;t even use my $300 podcast microphone):

这是相同的测试&＃xff0c;但使用Vista语音识别和便宜的Logitech USB耳机麦克风(我什至没有使用$ 300的播客麦克风)&＃xff1a;

YOUR RESULTS ARE:

您的结果是&＃xff1a;

Number of words typed: 377
Test duration: 3 min
Speed: 125.6 words/min. (628 keystrokes/min.)
Error penalty: 42
Accuracy: 88.9%

输入的字数&＃xff1a;377 测试时间&＃xff1a;3分钟速度&＃xff1a;125.6字/分钟(628次/分钟) 错误罚款&＃xff1a;42 准确度&＃xff1a;88.9&＃xff05;

Note the number of errors. I know it&＃39;s not 98% like some people, but I can almost double my personal typing speed with comparable errors using Voice Recognition.

注意错误的数量。 我知道这并不是像某些人那样的98&＃xff05;&＃xff0c;但是使用语音识别&＃xff0c;我的个人打字速度几乎可以翻倍&＃xff0c;但出现类似的错误。

Note that I only took these tests once each, both times cold, one with hands, one with voice and  the test gave me different text each time.

请注意&＃xff0c;我每次只进行一次这些测试&＃xff0c;两次都是冷的&＃xff0c;一次是用手&＃xff0c;一次是声音&＃xff0c;  测试每次给我不同的文字。

You have to talk like a newscaster, but seriously, stop giving Voice Recognition a hard time. Videos of Voice Recognition trying to write Perl code are cutesy, but not reality. Yes, it&＃39;d be nice to have custom templates out there for writing code with voice (there are some) but CodeRush helps me greatly. Ultimately voice recognition is for things like blogs, email and prose.

您必须像新闻播音员一样讲话&＃xff0c;但认真地说&＃xff0c;不要再让语音识别变得困难了。 尝试编写Perl代码的语音识别视频虽然很可爱&＃xff0c;但并不现实。 是的&＃xff0c;最好有自定义模板以使用语音编写代码(有一些)&＃xff0c;但是CodeRush可以极大地帮助我。 语音识别最终适用于博客&＃xff0c;电子邮件和散文。

Here&＃39;s a VERY boring, very poor sound/visual quickie video of me actually taking the test. Note that I (gratuitously) stopped to correct two errors, using only voice in the middle. Otherwise I&＃39;d probably have gotten 140wpm. Sorry about the poor focus, I probably should have used Camtasia.

这是我参加考试的非常无聊&＃xff0c;非常差的声音/视觉快速录像。 请注意&＃xff0c;我(幸运地)停下来纠正两个错误&＃xff0c;只在中间使用了语音。 否则我大概会达到140wpm。 抱歉&＃xff0c;关注点不佳&＃xff0c;我可能应该使用Camtasia。

And yes, this blog post was written with voice recognition.  So phooey on you. I encourage you to give it a try with a nice microphone, if even only for email and blog posts.

是的&＃xff0c;这篇博客文章是用语音识别编写的。 如此对你。 我鼓励您尝试一下带有不错的麦克风&＃xff0c;即使仅用于电子邮件和博客文章也是如此。

翻译自: https://www.hanselman.com/blog/typing-test-twice-once-with-voice-recognition

python一次性键入数组