地图:Eto:在命令模式下探索?-Map:Eto:Exploreincommandmode?

32  

:E would normally suffice as is if :Explore were the only defined command that began with an E. You evidently have multiple such commands defined, so :E is ambiguous and results in an error.

如果:Explore是由E开始的唯一定义的命令，那么它就足够了。显然，你已经定义了多个这样的命令，所以E是不明确的，结果是错误的。

:cmap causes immediate literal substitution and thus has unwanted side effects. A slightly better alternative is :cabbrev, which can be used to define abbreviations for command mode:

:cmap会导致直接的文字替换，因此会产生不必要的副作用。更好的选择是:cabbrev，它可以用来定义命令模式的缩写:

cabbrev E Explore

This triggers following EEnter or ESpace. The former is desired because typing :EEnter will invoke :Explore, but the latter again has side effects in command mode.

这将触发EEnter或ESpace。前者是需要的，因为输入:EEnter会调用:Explore，但后者在命令模式下会有副作用。

In order for :E to be properly aliased to :Explore, it must be defined as a separate command:

为了使E能够正确地别名:Explore，它必须被定义为一个单独的命令:

command! E Explore

However, :command E, which lists all defined commands that start with E, reveals that :E and :Explore have different properties. For example, it's impossible to execute :E ~ because :E does not accept any arguments. Also, unlike :Explore, :E does not autocomplete directories.

但是，命令E，它列出从E开始的所有定义的命令，显示:E和:Explore具有不同的属性。例如，不可能执行:E ~因为:E不接受任何参数。另外，不像:Explore，:E不自动完成目录。

To remedy these deficiencies, :E must be defined in exactly the same way as :Explore. Executing :verbose command Explore shows the location of the script in which :Explore is defined; :E can then be defined in the same manner, with the addition of :

为了弥补这些不足，E必须以完全相同的方式定义:探索。执行:verbose命令探索显示了脚本的位置:定义了Explore;:E可以用同样的方式定义，加上 :

command! -nargs=* -bar -bang -count=0 -complete=dir E Explore 

While it's possible to deduce most of these attributes from the information provided by :command Explore, there can still be discrepancies, such as -bar in this case.

虽然可以从以下提供的信息中推断出这些属性的大部分，但是仍然存在差异，比如在这种情况下的-bar。

N.B. If :Explore and :Example are defined, :Exp and :Exa are the shortest unambiguous commands that can be used. Explicitly aliasing :E to one of them, as above, overrides Vim's default behavior and allows for disambiguation. However, :Ex would still be ambiguous.

如果:Explore和:Example被定义，Exp和:Exa是可以使用的最短的、明确的命令。显式别名:E的其中一个，如上所述，重写了Vim的默认行为，并允许消除歧义。然而，Ex仍然是模棱两可的。